ABSTRACT
Introduction: Croatian National Cancer Registry of Croatian Institute for Public Health reported that in year 2020 lung cancer was the second most common cancer site diagnosed in men with 16% and the third most common in women with 10% incidence among all cancer sites. Unfortunatelly lung cancer has the highest mortality in both men and women. Haematological malignancies had 7% share in all malignancies in both male and female cances cases. In 2020 190 newly diagnosed cases of lymphatic leukemia in men and 128 cases in women were reporeted, meaning 1.5 and 1.2% of all malignancies, respectively. Chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL) is an advanced age disease and incidence increases with age. Impaired immunity, T and B cell dysfunction in CLL, chromosomal aberations, long-term immunosuppressive therapy and genetic factors can all cause secondary malignancies. Co- occurence of solid tumors and CLL is very rare. Although patiens with CLL have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies including lung carcinoma, the data about their clinical outcomes are lacking. Parekh et al. retrospectively analyzed patients with simultaneous CLL and lung carcinoma over a 20-year period, and they found that ~2% of patients with CLL actually developed lung carcinoma. The authors claimed that up to 38% of patients will also develop a third neoplasm more likely of the skin (melanoma and basal cell carcinoma), larynx (laryngeal carcinoma) or colon. Currently there are no specific guidelines for concurrent CLL and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treatment. Usually, when the tumors are diagnosed simultaneously, treatment is based to target the most aggressive malignancy, as the clinical outcomes depend on the response of the tumor with the poorest prognosis. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. Case report: A patient with history of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 2019 (at the age of 71) with B chronic lymphocytic leukemia with bulky tumor (inguinal lymph nodes 8x5 cm), stage B according to Binet, intermediate risk. He was treated with 6 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab/cyclofosfamid/fludarabine). In 10/2019 remission was confirmed, but MSCT described tumor in the posterior segment of upper right lung lobe measuring 20x17 mm and bilateral metastases up to 11 mm. Bronchoscopy and biopsy were performed, and EGFR neg, ALK neg, ROS 1 neg, PD-L1>50% adenocarcinoma was confirmed. He was referred to Clinical Hospital Center Osijek where monotherapy with pembrolizumab in a standard dose of 200 mg intravenously was started in 01/2020. Partial remission was confirmed in October 2020. Immunotherapy was discontinued due to development of pneumonitis, dysphagia and severe weight loss (20kg), but without radiologically confirmed disease progression. At that time he was referred to our hospital for further treatment. Gastroscopy has shown erosive gastritis with active duodenal ulcus, Forrest III. Supportive therapy and proton pump inhibitor were introduced. After complete regression of pneumonitis, improvement of general condition and resolution of dysphagia, no signs of lung cancer progression were found and pembrolizumab was reintroduced in 12/2021. Hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 01/2021 and levothyroxine replacement ther apy was started. In 03/2021 he underwent surgical removal of basal cell carcinoma of skin on the right temporal region with lobe reconstruction. From 02/2021, when pembrolizumab was reintroduced, regression in tumor size was continously confirmed with complete recovery of general condition. He was hospitalized for COVID 19 infection in 09/2021, and due to complications pembrolizumab was discontinued till 11/2021. Lung cancer immunotherapy proceeded till 11/2022, when Multidisciplinary team decided to finish pembrolizumab because of CLL relapse. CLL was in remission till August 2022 when due to B symptoms, lymphcytosis, anemia and generalized lymphadenopathy, hematological workup including biopsy of cervical lymph node was performed and CLL/SLL relapse was confirmed. Initially chlorambucil was introduced, but disease was refractory. Based on cytogenetic test results (IGHV unmutated, negative TP53) and due to cardiovascular comorbidity (contraindication for BTK inhibitors) venetoclax and rituximab were started in 01/2023. After just 1 cycle of treatment normal blood count as well as regression of B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy occured, indicating the probability of complete disease remission. In our patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma excellent disease control is achieved during 41 month of treatment in first line setting. Furthermore, relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL is currently in confirmed remission. Conclusion(s): Successful treatment of patients with multiple primary malignancies is based on multidisciplinarity, early recognition and management of side effects, treatment of comorbidities with the aim of prolonging life, controlling symptoms of disease and preserving quality of life.
ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: Amniotic fluid (AF)-derived EVs are currently under investigation for use as anti-inflammatory therapeutics in COVID-19 and COVID-19 long haulers. The dysregulation of the immune response induced by SARS-COV-2 is a key driver of both acute COVID-19 induced lung injury and long term COVID-19 sequela. There is a clear need to identify therapeutics that suppress excessive inflammation and reduce immune cell exhaustion to improve patient short term and long-term outcomes. Amniotic fluid (AF)- derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have previously been shown to deliver anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory signals to diverse cellular targets. We aimed to test if AF-EVs carry immune-suppressive molecules and can suppress T-cell immune activation and exhaustion in vitro. Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): The AF-EV biologic tested was derived from AF collected from consenting donors during planned, fullterm cesarean sections. AF was centrifuged and filtered to remove cellular debris and create a product containing AF-EVs and soluble extracellular components. Fluorescent EXODOT analysis was performed to demonstrate the presence of EV markers CD9, CD81, ALIX, and immune suppressive molecule PD-L1. T-cell activation/exhaustion was induced in vitro by treating human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with activation agent PHA for 3 days with the addition of AF-EVs or saline control. Immune activation/exhaustion was measured by flow cytometry to determine the expression of PD-1 on CD3+ T-cells. The AF-EV biologic was characterized to contain EVs with positive expression of CD9, CD81, ALIX, and PL-L1. T-cell activation/exhaustion was upregulated in response to PHA and was significantly reduced by 8% in AF-EV treated T-cells compared to saline control (77.7% vs 85.7%, respectively P<0.05). These findings demonstrate that AF-EVs do express PD-L1, a surface marker that has previously been demonstrated to contribute to exosome-mediated immunosuppression. Furthermore, we confirmed in vitro that AF-EVs suppress T-cell activation/ exhaustion in the presence of a T-cell activation agent. COVID-19 long haulers have been described to have upregulated and pro-longed immune activation and T-cell exhaustion, marked by an increase in PD1+ T-cells. Therefore, this finding serves as a starting point for the development of a potential mechanism of action that may describe AF-EV's therapeutic effect in COVID-19 long hauler patients.Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background: Infections with SARS-CoV- 2 cause the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Alterations in immune cells of COVID-19 patients may predict the subsequent severity of disease. The changes in composition of immune cells in COVID-19 patients include lymphopenia, lower neutrophil to lymphocyte-ratios and an eosinopenia in about 50 to 80% of hospitalized patients. Eosinophils and neutrophils can interact with T cells via immune checkpoints receptors such as programmed death (PD)-1 on T cells and its counterpart PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on eosinophils or neutrophils. There are only limited studies on PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions in viral infections, we aimed to elucidate the interplay of T cells and other peripheral cells by analysing the immune checkpoints PD-1 and PD-L1 in expression during COVID-19. Method(s): Using flow cytometry, we have now analysed the immune checkpoint receptor expressions on whole blood cells from a total of 38 COVID-19 patients. The patient cohort comprises all ages and both sexes with the disease severity ranging from mild, moderate to severe, with ~10% mortality. We have further been investigating 21 biomarkers (G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-gamma, TGF-beta1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-23, IL-33, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1beta, TNF-alpha, and YKL-40) in plasma on a cohort of 76 COVID-19 patients using the MesoScale Multiplex Assay platform, with 48 healthy controls. Result(s): PD-L1 expression on eosinophils was significantly lower in COVID-19 patients in initial stages of infection, relative to healthy controls. There was an inverse relationship between disease progression and the expression of PD-1 on CD8+ T cells. These data suggests that analysis of PD-L1- PD1 cell networks in immune cells of EDTA blood of COVID-19 patients can predict disease outcomes. While most detectable biomarkers are strongly increased in COVID samples overall compared to healthy controls, the more severe the disease the higher the blood biomarker concentration. Conclusion(s): Taken together, the analysis of PD-L1- PD1 cell networks in immune cells together with plasma biomarkers of COVID-19 patients can predict disease outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Background The phase III CheckMate 816 study demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant N + C vs C in patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC. Here, we report 3-y efficacy, safety, and exploratory biomarker analyses from CheckMate 816. Methods Adults with stage IB (tumors >=4 cm)-IIIA (per AJCC 7th ed) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS <= 1, and no known EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to N 360 mg + C Q3W or C alone Q3W for 3 cycles followed by surgery. Primary endpoints were EFS and pCR, both per blinded independent review. Exploratory analyses included EFS by surgical approach and extent/completeness of resection, and EFS and pCR by a 4-gene (CD8A, CD274, STAT-1, LAG-3) inflammatory signature score derived from RNA sequencing of baseline (BL) tumor samples. Results At a median follow-up of 41.4 mo (database lock, Oct 14, 2022), continued EFS benefit was observed with N + C vs C (HR, 0.68;95% CI, 0.49-0.93);3-y EFS rates were 57% and 43%, respectively. N + C improved EFS vs C in pts who had surgery, regardless of surgical approach or extent of resection, and in pts with R0 resection (table). Recurrence occurred in 28% and 42% of pts who had surgery in the N + C (n = 149) and C arms (n = 135), respectively. In the N + C arm, BL 4-gene inflammatory signature scores were numerically higher in pts with pCR vs pts without, and EFS was improved in pts with high vs low scores (data to be presented). Grade 3-4 treatment-related and surgery-related adverse events occurred in 36% and 11% of pts in the N + C arm, respectively, vs 38% and 15% in the C arm. Conclusions Neoadjuvant N + C continues to provide long-term clinical benefit vs C in pts with resectable NSCLC, regardless of surgical approach or extent of resection. Exploratory analyses in pts treated with N + C suggested that high BL tumor inflammation may be associated with improved EFS and pCR. Clinical trial identification NCT02998528. Editorial acknowledgement Medical writing and editorial support for the development of this , under the direction of the authors, was provided by Adel Chowdhury, PharmD, Samantha Dwyer, PhD, and Michele Salernitano of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Legal entity responsible for the study Bristol Myers Squibb. Funding Bristol Myers Squibb. Disclosure P.M. Forde: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, F-Star, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Iteos, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Surface;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus, Kyowa, Novartis, Regeneron;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Trial steering committee member: AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Scientific advisory board member: LUNGevity Foundation. J. Spicer: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CLS Therapeutics, Merck, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Regeneron, Roche, Xenetic Biosciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, PeerView;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Data safety monitoring board member: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Industry chair: Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons. [Formula presented] N. Girard: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Mirati, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Sanofi, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Grunenthal, Tak da, Owkin;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Local: Roche, Sivan, Janssen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, International Thymic malignancy interest group, president: ITMIG;Other, Personal, Other, Family member is an employee: AstraZeneca. M. Provencio: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. S. Lu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GenomiCare, Hutchison MediPharma, Roche, Simcere, ZaiLab;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Hanosh, Roche. M. Awad: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: ArcherDX, Ariad, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Maverick, Merck, Mirati, Nektar, NextCure, Novartis, Syndax;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Eli Lilly. T. Mitsudomi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim, BridgeBio Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Guardant, Invitae, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Former president: IASLC. E. Felip: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Fundacion Merck Salud, Merck KGAa;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BerGenBio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck, MSD, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, touchONCOLOGY;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Grifols. S.J. Swanson: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Ethicon. F. Tanaka: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Ono, Taiho;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: AstraZeneca, Chugai, Ono;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Covidien, Eli Lilly, Intuitive, Johnson & Johnson, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Olympus, Ono, Pfizer, Stryker, Taiho, Takeda. P. Tran: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. N. Hu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Cai: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support for attending meetings and travel: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Bushong: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Neely: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. D. Balli: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, patents planned, issued, or pending: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. S.R. Broderick: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by E sevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background: Residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early HER2- negative breast cancer (BC) remains an unmet medical need. However, no therapies to date have tested their activity directly in chemo-resistant RD. Here, we hypothesized that combining an oncolytic virus such as T-VEC with atezolizumab may offer clinical benefit in patients (pts) with RD after standard NAC. To our knowledge, PROMETEO is the first trial that examines the activity of immunotherapy in pts with RD prior to surgery. Method(s): PROMETEO (NCT03802604) is a singlearm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Women with triple-negative BC (TNBC) or hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with baseline (i.e., before NAC) ki67 >= 20% were eligible. RD was confirmed with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a tumor diameter >= 10 mm and a core-biopsy detecting the presence of invasive cells. Before surgery, T-VEC was administered intratumorally on week 1 (106 pfu/mL), then in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter (108 pfu/mL) for 4 injections. Atezolizumab (840 mg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 infusions, starting at week 4. Surgery was performed in < 3 weeks after completing the treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination, measured by the rate of residual cancer burden (RCB) class 0/1 at surgery. Tumor samples collected at 5 timepoints (before NAC, during screening period, after first dose of T-VEC, after first dose of T-VEC and atezolizumab and at surgery) were mandatory to assess gene expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), immune cells PD-L1 IHC (SP142), tumor mutational burden (TMB) by FoundationOne and other translational endpoints. Result(s): Between Dec 2018 to Feb 2022, 28 pts were enrolled: 20 pts with HR+/HER2- disease and 8 pts with TNBC. Median age was 47 (range 31-71) and 71% of pts were premenopausal. At diagnosis before NAC, clinical stage II disease represented 60.7%, cN+ 60.7%, median Ki-67 was 37.5% (range 20%-95%), high TILs (>=10%) 37%, median TMB was 3 (0-19) and only 1 of 27 pts (3.7%) had a PD-L1-positive tumor. After NAC, mean tumor size by MRI was 28.3 mm (10-93). Two pts discontinued from the trial (1 withdrawal of consent and 1 COVID infection). The completion of 5 cycles of treatment was achieved by 73% of pts. The overall RCB-0/1 rate was 25% (7 of 28, 95% IC 10.7 - 44.9%), all with RCB 0 (pathologic complete response [pCR]). The pCR rate was 30% in HR+/HER2- disease and 12.5 % in TNBC. Radiological response by MRI was achieved by 3 of 28 pts (10.7%). Interestingly, none of the 7 pts with a pCR had radiological response (stable disease n=5, progressive disease [PD] n=2). Six pts (21.4%) had radiological PD and had RCB 2/3. Overall, 27 (96%) patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade. Most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were fever (11 pts, 39.3%), ALT increased (9 pts, 32.1%), AST increased (8 pts, 28.6%), arthralgia (6 pts, 21.4%) and anemia (6 pts, 21.4%). Grade 3 reversible neutropenia occurred in 1 patient. Across all pts, significant increases (p< 0.001) in TILs, immune genes and immune PDL1+ cells were observed after 1 dose of TVEC, 1 dose of the combination and at surgery. Intrinsic subtype changes at surgery occurred in 73.1% of cases, mostly (46.1%) Luminal A/B converting to Normal-like. At surgery, 19 of 26 (73.1%) of tumors were PDL1+. Conclusion(s): Two months of T-VEC in combination with atezolizumab induced a pCR in a subgroup of pts with chemoresistant HER2- breast cancer. This effect is probably related to the immune activation provoked by the combined treatment. Interestingly, a high discrepancy was observed between the presurgical radiological imaging and the actual surgical pathological report. Pre-operative window-ofopportunity trials in this context might provide important clues regarding the activity of novel treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has taken over the world, and more than 38 lakh deaths had been reported till now due to this infectious disease. It has been declared a global pandemic by the world health organization. SARS-CoV-2 causes coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), and the major problem called "Cytokine storm" is reported, which may lead to death among the COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to review the Cytokine storm and its mechanism along with few immunomodulatory therapies for SARSCoV-2 infection suppression effectively. Method(s): The recently published works of literature were selected and reviewed based on the subject of this study. The databases, including Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched extensively. Result(s): The review of the literature showed that an uncontrolled immune response causes excess inflammation. Evidence from recent trials has demonstrated that cytokine storms can be an important factor in the COVID-19 severity, leading to multiple organ failure and death. Conclusion(s): This study reviewed immunomodulatory therapies and strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients to suppress the immune response. Ultimately, the cytokine storm can prove to be a boon and reduce the significant death tolls to SARS-CoV-2 infection.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with HR- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC) with a low level of HER2 (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score 1+ or IHC 2+ and negative in situ hybridization [ISH]) have poor prognosis. Combining 1L chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors can modestly improve outcomes vs chemotherapy alone, but treatment benefit is largely seen in patients with PD-L1+ disease. BEGONIA (NCT03742102) is an ongoing 2-part, open-label platform study, evaluating safety and efficacy of D, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, combined with other novel therapies in 1L triple-negative a/mBC, including HR-, HER2-low disease. T-DXd is a trastuzumab-topoisomerase I inhibitor antibody-drug conjugate that improves survival in patients with previously treated HR-, HER2-low mBC (NCT03734029;Modi NEJM 2022). Here, we report updated results of the T-DXd + D combination from BEGONIA. Method(s): Patients with unresectable HR-, HER2-low (per local testing, IHC 2+/ISH-, IHC 1+/ISH-, or IHC 1+/ISH untested) a/mBC were enrolled in the T-DXd + D arm. Patients eligible for 1L treatment, regardless of PD-L1 status, received intravenous T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg + D 1120 mg every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. PD-L1, assessed using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay, was defined as high if >= 5% of the tumor area was populated by PDL1-expressing tumor or immune cells. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR;RECIST v1.1);progressionfree survival [PFS];and response duration. Patients included in the efficacy analysis had >= 2 ontreatment disease assessments, progressed, died, or withdrew from the study. Result(s): As of April 8, 2022, 56 patients received T-DXd + D (34 ongoing) and 46 were included in the efficacy analysis. Median (range) follow-up was 10.1 (0-22) months. Median age was 53.5 years, 71% had received prior treatment for early stage BC, and 64% had visceral metastases at baseline. Confirmed ORR was 26/46 (57% 95% CI, 41-71) and unconfirmed ORR was 33/54 (61% 95% CI, 47-74);1/46 patients (2%) had complete and 25/46 (54%) had partial responses. Confirmed response occurred irrespective of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 high ORR, 5/7 [71%];PD-L1 low, 13/21 [62%];PD-L1 missing, 8/18 [44%]). Median duration of response was not reached;however, 64% of patients remained in response at 12 month follow-up and 73% had an ongoing response at data cutoff. Median PFS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 8-not reached). Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the agents' known safety, with treatment-related AEs occurring in 49 patients (88%), any Grade 3/4 AEs in 18 patients (32%), and any serious AEs in 10 patients (18%). The most common all-Grade AEs were nausea (41 [73%]), fatigue (26 [46%]), and vomiting (17 [30%]). Adjudicated treatment-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred for 5 patients (9%), which were mostly Grade 1 or 2 and 1 case of Grade 5 associated with COVID pneumonia. Seven patients (13%) and 21 patients (38%) had T-DXd dose reduction and dose delay, respectively;22 (39%) had D dose delay. Seven patients (13%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. Conclusion(s): For patients with HR-, HER2-low a/mBC, T-DXd in combination with D in the 1L setting shows manageable safety and promising efficacy including durable responses and an encouraging PFS. Although subgroups were small, responses were observed irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Analysis of additional translational data is ongoing. Funding(s): AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with urgent implementation of safety protocols limiting the number of on-site personnel, curtailed the utilization of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for CT-guided lung biopsies at our institution. The pandemic, therefore, created an opportunity to examine the role of ROSE in diagnostic adequacy and ancillary testing yield for CT-guided lung biopsies. Material(s) and Method(s): We retrospectively identified all CT-guided lung biopsies performed from 2017-2021. The utilization of ROSE, adequacy of final diagnoses, and ancillary testing yield (PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, next generation sequencing) were ed from pathology reports and compared between 2017-2019 and 2020-2021. Cases were considered nondiagnostic if a definitive neoplastic diagnosis could not be rendered (e.g., atypical or suspicious diagnoses) or the histologic features did not explain imaging findings. Chi-square tests of independence were performed to examine relations between variables. Result(s): 766 CT-guided lung biopsies were performed from 2017-2021;174 (23%) utilized ROSE. The use of ROSE had been steadily decreasing prior to the pandemic and essentially ceased at the onset of the pandemic and never returned to pre-pandemic volumes (Figure 1). Overall (2017-2021), ROSE was more likely to be associated with an adequate final diagnosis (p=.003) and successful molecular testing (p=.013). ROSE was not associated with adequacy of PD-L1 results (p=.797). Comparing the periods 2017-2019 and 2020-2021 (with decreased utilization of ROSE in the latter), there was a trend towards a higher percentage of inadequate final diagnoses (17 vs. 24%, p=.08). Conclusion(s): Overall, ROSE was associated with higher diagnostic and molecular testing yields for CT-guided lung biopsies. The COVID-19 pandemic markedly reduced ROSE use during these procedures;evaluation of the impact on clinical care is ongoing with further studies investigating lesion size, number of passes, and need for repeat procedures.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated efficacy in a small fraction of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), some with durable responses. The receptor tyrosine kinase AXL and its sole ligand, GAS6, are possible mediators of T cell exclusion and an attractive target due to the expected synergy between AXL inhibition and immune targeting agents. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, and efficacy of the combination of AXL inhibition via AVB-S6-500 with durvalumab (MEDI4736) were evaluated in patients with PROC. Methods: In this open-label Phase Ib open-label study, patients with PROC received AVB-S6-500 and durvalumab therapy in escalating dosing regimens guided by a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design: durvalumab (1500 mg Q4W) and AVB-S6-500 (10mg/kg Q2W, 15mg/kg Q2W, 20mg/kg Q2W) with durvalumab infused prior to AVB-S6-500. The response was evaluated using modified RECIST v1.1. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies were collected, and PD-L1 status and tumor/tumor microenvironment AXL and GAS6 staining pre and on-treatment were assessed. Results: Eleven patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (six clear cells [55%], four high-grade serous [36%], one endometrioid histology [1%]) received treatment per protocol. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range: 1-5);73% (8/11) of patients had received prior bevacizumab. There were no DLTs noted over the 6-week period and no grade ≥3 adverse events attributed to study drugs. Five patients experienced an immune-related AE, most commonly liver enzyme elevations (36%). Infusion reaction with AVB-S6- 500 was noted in the first two subjects, prompting the institution of a premedication regimen, after which only one of the nine additional patients experienced an infusion reaction. Dose delays greater than one week occurred in six (55%) patients;three patients experienced delays for cancer-related complications (small bowel obstruction, pneumonia, severe fatigue), while three patients experienced delays for non-medical causes (COVID/travel, weather). Patients received therapy for a median of two cycles (range: 1-6), and there were no responses noted across all dosing levels. One patient had stable disease, with a duration of response of three months. Only two patients had strong (2+) AXLstaining on pretreatment biopsy, both with high-grade serous histology. The majority of serum AXL levels were within previously demonstrated ranges (range: 5.6-112ng/mL), though two patients had comparatively high levels (102, 112ng/mL). PK/PD analysis revealed expected AVB-S6-500 levels at initial postdose (C1D1), but low levels at trough (C2D1 predose) when compared to prior AVB-S6-500 data [1]. Conclusions: The combination of AVB-S6-500 and durvalumab was tolerable in this PROC patient population at all dosing levels tested. Exploratory studies to correlate lack of response to AXL-GAS6 pathway alterations, tumor microenvironment, and clinical characteristics, such as prior treatment, dosing delays, burden of disease, and ascites, are ongoing.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Durvalumab received EMA approval as consolidation therapy (CT) for unresectable stage III NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥1% and who did not have progression after CRT. Our objective was to analyze in real clinical practice the effectiveness of durvalumab and explore the clinical factors that may be associated with the benefit from CT. Methods: Retrospective study was made at Hospital of Leon (Spain), including 37 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with durvalumab after CRT treatment between March 2018 and october 2021 (40.5% patients were included in the durvalumab early access program). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could identified after CRT as a factor that may be benefit from durvalumab. Results: Median age was 67 years (range 46-82 years). 40.5% of patients were ≥70 years old. 78.4% were male and 51.4% smokers. 54% had non-squamous histology. PD-L1 expression was <1% in 5% and not available in 8% patients. 2.7% ROS1 rearrangements, 5.4% KRAS mutations and not available in 43.2% patients. Stage IIIA, IIIB, IIIC disease were 24.3%, 54.1% and 21.6%, respectively. Median time from end of CRT to onset durvalumab was 44 days (range 13-120 days). Overall median CT duration was 214.8 days (range 69-399 days) with a median of 14 infusions (range 6-27 infusions). With a median follow up of 19.7 months (range 1.4-34.9 months);67.6% had stopped CT: 37.8% due to completing treatment, 16.2% disease progression, 10.8% adverse event and 2.7% due to COVID19 infection. Median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 17 months (95% CI, 11-23). Median real-world overall survival (rwOS) was 29.9 months (95% CI, 23.3-36.6). %rwOS at 6, 18 and 24 months were 100%, 86.9% and 74.5%, respectively. For patients with post-CRT NLR not exceeding the cohort median value of 6, receipt of durvalumab was associated with an improvement in rwOS (median not reached vs 25.7 months;p=0.025). 56.8% patients had any grade of radiation pneumonitis (median time from CRT start: 119 days [range 36-241 days]). Of these, 19% patients developed worsening of radiation pneumonitis with durvalumab. 54,1% developed immune-mediated toxicity, mostly G1-2 (85.1%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of durvalumab consolidation in this patients population in a real-life setting. We identified low NLR after CRT as a potentially predictive factor for the benefit of CT in locally advanced NSCLC. Keywords: DURVALUMAB, PACIFIC, REAL WORLD DATA
ABSTRACT
Introduction: One of the leading treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors, including programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. PD-L1 molecule expressed on tumor cells causes PD-1+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) exhaustion and thus escape from immune surveillance. Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway by monoclonal antibodies enables restoration of the anti-tumor response. PD-L1 expression is regulated by epigenetic factors, e.g.: microRNAs (miRNAs). The aim of presented study was to evaluate the expression of PD-L1 mRNA and its regulators: microRNA-17, microRNA-93 and microRNA-142 in plasma from patients with early stages of NSCLC. Methods: The study was carried out (as a master's thesis) on 50 individuals (18 controls and 32 patients with NSCLC). Total RNA with microRNA fraction was extracted from plasma and quantitative PCR with reverse transcription was conducted afterwards. The expression was evaluated with the use of 2-ΔCt method. Statistical analysis was conducted with the use of Statistica 13.3 program. Results: The PD-L1 mRNA expression was detected in 40% individuals with NSCLC, whereas it was not detected in the healthy individuals at all. It was found that microRNA-17 and microRNA-142 expression is negatively correlated with tumor size. Also, it was demonstrated that the expression of these molecules is significantly higher in healthy controls when compared with lung cancer patients. ROC analysis showed that sensitivity and specificity values in distinguishing the cancer patients from the healthy controls with all tested microRNAs have reached high values. Conclusions: Presumably, PD-L1 mRNA appears in the plasma along with the tumor occurrence, and its expression increases as the disease progresses. The tested microRNAs constitute potential non-invasive biomarkers to detect tumors impossible to observe in low-sensitive imaging tests. Moreover, these tests do not require the patient's hospitalization, which is extremely important in the era of Covid-19 virus pandemic. It could be a starting point of research on diagnostic potential of analyzed molecules. The findings are the result of research conducted as part of a master's thesis which was awarded first prize in the Faculty Thesis Competition at the Medical University of Lublin. Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer, microRNA, PD-L1
ABSTRACT
Background: Gal-3 is a protein that binds specifically to N-acetylglucosamine-expressing carbohydrates, which are upregulated on key tumorigenic cell surface proteins. Gal-3 is widely over-expressed in the tumor microenvironment and is generally linked to poor outcomes. Gal-3 regulates immune cell function of T cells and macrophages, and promotes neovascularization and fibrosis [Peng Cancer Res 2008;Markowska J Biol Chem 2011;Kouo Cancer Immunol Res 2015]. Gal-3 sequesters interferon gamma, reduces T-cell influx, and contributes to tumor cell evasion of the immune system via LAG-3 activation [Chen PNAS 2009;Gordon-Alonso Nat Commun 2017]. Gal-3 has been identified as a marker of resistance to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs);patients with stage IV NSCLC with high Gal-3 levels (> 70% Gal-3 immunohistochemical staining) have been shown to be resistant to the CPI pembrolizumab [Capalbo Int J Mol Sci 2019]. Animal data indicate synergy between CPI therapy and Gal-3 inhibition [Vuong Cancer Res 2019;Zhang FEBS Open Bio 2021]. Thus, inhibiting Gal-3 together with CPI-based immunotherapy may enhance tumor-specific immune responses, and overcome CPI resistance. Methods: GALLANT-1 (NCT05240131) is a 3-part, placebo-controlled phase Ib/IIa trial that will investigate safety and efficacy of GB1211 (a Gal-3 inhibitor) + atezo vs placebo + atezo in patients with advanced NSCLC. Part A will include 8-12 patients and study safety and tolerability of 200 mg and 400 mg GB1211 twice-daily + atezo (open-label). Primary endpoint is number of adverse events (AEs) after 12 weeks' treatment and will determine the dosage for Part B. Part B will include 75-94 patients, and is a randomized, double-blind study of GB1211 + atezo or placebo + atezo. Primary endpoints are safety (number of AEs) and efficacy (percentage change from baseline in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions after 12 weeks' treatment). Part C is an expansion study including patients from Parts A and B, with safety and efficacy assessments. Eligibility criteria: advanced or metastatic stage IIIB or IV NSCLC adenocarcinoma;measurable disease per RECIST v1.1;expression of programmed death ligand-1 on ≥50% of tumor cells;eligible for 1200 mg atezo every 3 weeks. Exclusion criteria: symptomatic, untreated, or actively progressing central nervous system metastases;prior systemic chemotherapy for treatment of recurrent advanced or metastatic disease, except if part of neoadjuvant/ adjuvant therapy;prior treatment with immune CPIs and/or GB1211;presence of EGFR mutation and ALK, ROS1, and RET alterations;treatment with antineoplastic or systemic immunotherapeutic agents prior to first GB1211 dose;severe infectious disease < 4 weeks prior to first GB1211 dose;active hepatitis B or C, HIV, or COVID-19. The study is being initiated;updated enrollment status will be presented at the meeting.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cancer patients infected with COVID-19 are very vulnerable to increased complications and mortality while actively being treated with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The full impact of COVID-19 infections on this subset of patients has not been fully defined. Our goal was to track clinical outcomes in patients with an underlying malignancy and COVID-19 infection who received chemotherapy or ICIs. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 121 patients (age > 18 years) at the University of Alabama-Birmingham from January 2020 till November 2021 with an advanced solid malignancy that were treated with chemotherapy or ICIs within 12 months of their COVID-19 diagnosis. The aim of this study was to track clinical outcomes including: hospitalization rates, ICU admissions, treatments, and deaths of any cause. Results: A total of 121 patients were examined in this study and 61 received immunotherapy treatment within 12 months. The median age at diagnosis for the ICI group was 62.3 years and 54% were male while for the patients that receive chemotherapy the median age at diagnosis was 65.1 years and 53% were male (Table1). The 3 most common cancers represented in the ICI cohort were lung (30%, NSCLC), liver (13%, HCC) and renal (11%, RCC). While in the chemotherapy group, the 3 most cancers were NSCLC (40%), HCC (12%,), and head & neck (10%, H&N). 25% of patients on ICIs died while only 13% of patients died post chemotherapy. Of the ICI patients that died, 33% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 53% received oxygen, steroids and antiviral therapy. For the chemotherapy patients that died, 25% were admitted to the ICU and 50% received oxygen, steroids and antiviral therapy. Patients with lower ECOG (0.98) had lower mortality compared to patients with worse functional status (0.98 vs 1.52;t = 3.20;p < 0.01). Factors associated with increased admission were higher ECOG (1.07 vs 1.67;f = 3.05;p = 0.05), higher AST (21.2 vs 40.9, f = 10.2;p < 0.001), lower absolute lymphocyte count (1122.8 vs 408.9, f = 5.99;p < 0.01) and higher oxygen needs (0.02 vs 1.11, f = 29.5;p < 0.001). Conclusions: ICI mortality was higher compared to patients receiving chemotherapy, especially for those with reduced functional status. Factors for hospitalization included: higher ECOG, higher AST, lower lymphocyte count and increased oxygen needs. However, further investigation still needs to be undertaken to understand if the PD-1-PD-L1 pathway with the subsequent inflammatory cascade post COVID-19 can impact overall survival.
ABSTRACT
Background: Durable clinical benefit has been achieved with nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI), including an overall survival (OS) of 49% and a melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of 56%, with median MSS not reached (NR) at 6.5-y minimum follow-up. Here we report sustained efficacy outcomes at 7.5 y. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 and stratified by PD-L1 status, BRAF mutation status, and metastasis stage to receive NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg for 4 doses Q3W, followed by NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W (n = 314);NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + placebo (n = 316);or IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses + placebo (n = 315) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS with NIVO + IPI or NIVO alone versus IPI. Results: With a minimum follow-up of 7.5 y, median OS remained stable at 72.1 mo (NIVO + IPI), 36.9 mo (NIVO), and 19.9 mo (IPI);median MSS was NR, 49.4 mo, and 21.9 mo, respectively (Table). While the objective response rate remained stable at 58% (NIVO + IPI), 45% (NIVO), and 19% (IPI), median duration of response had now been reached for NIVO at 90.8 mo and remains NR and 19.2 mo for NIVO + IPI and IPI, respectively. Subsequent systemic therapy was received by 36%, 49%, and 66% of NIVO + IPI-, NIVO-, and IPI-treated patients, respectively, and median time to that therapy was NR (95% CI, 45.9-NR), 24.7 mo (16.0-38.7), and 8.0 mo (6.5-8.7). Of patients alive at 7.5 y, 106/138 (77%, NIVO + IPI), 80/115 (70%, NIVO), and 27/60 (45%, IPI) were off treatment and had never received subsequent systemic therapy. No change to the safety summary was observed with additional follow-up;updated health-related quality of life data will be reported. Of the 10 new deaths since the 6.5-y follow-up (ie, 5 NIVO + IPI;3 NIVO;2 IPI), none were treatment-related;4 were due to melanoma progression;1 was due to an unknown cause;and 5 were due to other causes, but not associated with a COVID diagnosis. Conclusions: The 7.5-y follow-up continues to demonstrate the durability of responses with NIVO + IPI and an ongoing survival plateau. A substantial difference in median OS and MSS between patients treated with NIVO + IPI or NIVO was observed in descriptive analyses.
ABSTRACT
Background: ACC is a heterogeneous neoplasm and there is no standard treatment for patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) disease. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi) are frequently used to treat R/M ACC rendering mostly disease stabilization. ACC is resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (PD-L1i), consistent with its low mutational burden and uninflamed immune microenvironment. We hypothesized that the immunomodulatory role of VEGFRi (axitinib) would enhance PD-L1i (Avelumab) activity and be a more effective therapy for R/M ACC. Methods: Eligible pts had R/M ACC with radiological or clinical progression within 6 months (mos) of enrollment. Treatment consisted of axitinib 5 mg PO bid and avelumab 10 mg/Kg IV every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1;secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Simon 2-stage design was applied to test the null hypothesis of ORR ≤ 5% versus the alternative ORR ≥ 20%;≥ 4 responses out of 29 pts was required to reject the null hypothesis. Results: 41 pts enrolled from 07/24/19 to 06/29/ 21;28 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (7 screen failures, 6 evaluable for safety only due to loss of insurance/logistics issues related to COVID-19 pandemic);16 pts were treated in first-line. Mutation data was available for 23 of 28 evaluable pts;7 had NOTCH1 activating mutations. The ORR was 17.9% (5/28, 95%CI: 6.1-36.9%). One response was unconfirmed (pt progressed in non-target lesions 2 mos after achieving a PR), for a confirmed ORR of 14.3% (95%CI: 4-32.7%). The median follow-up time for the 15 alive pts was 11.6 mos (min-max: 7.7-29.2 mos). Median PFS was 7.2 mos (95%CI: 3.7-11.7 mos) with a 6-mos PFS rate of 57% (95%CI: 41-79%). Median OS was 17.4 mos (95%CI: 13-NA). 5 pts remain on therapy, 2/5 with a PR. The median DOR for the 5 responders was 5.2 mos (95% CI: 3.7-NA mos). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were fatigue (62%), hypertension (32%), diarrhea (29%), and stomatitis (29%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 8 (24%) pts, all grade 3 and manageable. 4 (15%) pts discontinued avelumab and 9 (32%) underwent axitinib dose reduction due to toxicity. Conclusions: The study reached its primary endpoint with ≥ 4 responses out of 28 evaluable pts (ORR of 17.8%;confirmed ORR of 14.3%). The ORR and 6- mos PFS rate of 57% with axitinib and avelumab compares favorably with single agent axitinib and warrants further study of the combination.
ABSTRACT
Background: Induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed CRT prior to surgery demonstrated positive results in the CALGB 80803 study. We investigated the safety and efficacy of adding D, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, to PET-directed CRT. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pts received 2 cycles of mFOLFOX6 prior to repeat PET/CT. PET responders (≥35% reduction in SUV (PETr)) received 5-FU/capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT to 50.4Gy, while induction PET non-responders (PETnr) received carboplatin/paclitaxel with RT. All Pts received D 1,500 mg q4W ×2 starting 2 weeks prior to CRT. Esophagectomy was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Pts with R0 resections received adjuvant D 1,500mg q4W ×6. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: 36 pts were enrolled. Clinical ≥T3 disease was seen in 32 pts (88.9%, cT4 = 3) and ≥N1 in 23 (63.9%) pts. PD-L1 CPS was ≥1 in 25 (71.4%) of 35 tested with 14 (40%) ≥5. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was identified in 3 (8.3%) pts. 25 (70%) pts were PETr. Preop treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Three pts had disease progression prior to surgery. pCR was identified in 8 (22.2%) pts and 22 (64.7%) had major pathologic response (MPR;ypTanyN0 + ≥90% response). Those with MSI tumors had ≥90% treatment response (1 pCR, 1: ypT1aN0 99% response, 1: ypT2N0, 90% response). 17 (73.9%) of 23 cN+ pts had ypN0 disease. MPR was associated with PD-L1 ≥1 (p = 0.03) and with a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB;p = 0.016) on MSK-IMPACT testing. Adjuvant D was commenced in 27 pts, with a median number of 6 cycles. Early discontinuation was due to risks of visits due to COVID19 (4, 15%), progressive disease (3, 11%), late surgical complications (2, 7%) and immune toxicity (1, 4%). With a median follow-up of 30 months, OS rates were 92% [95%CI: 83%-100%] and 85 % [95%CI: 74%-98%] at 12 and 24 months post induction. 12 and 24-month PFS rates were 81% [95%CI: 69%-95%] and 71% [95%CI: 58%-88%] respectively. In the 33 operated pts, 12 and 24-month disease free survival was 82% [95%CI: 70%-96%] and 78% [95%CI: 65%-94%], respectively. In addition to SUV on PET, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was correlated with pathologic response. In cases with borderline change in SUV, TLG could predict response to treatment. One PETnr with 30.8% reduction in SUV had 88.1% reduction in TLG and pCR. Conversely, a PETr (-36.3%) who had an increase in TLG (39.3%) had only 40% treatment response on pathology. Conclusions: The addition of D to induction FOLFOX and PETdirected CRT prior to surgery is safe and appears effective with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data. PD-L1 CPS≥1 and higher TMB may be associated with MPR. TLG is a novel PET variable that should be studied prospectively. Additional correlatives and comparison to a cohort treated with standard PET-directed CRT will be presented.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There are limited options for the treatment of malignant mesothelioma (MM) following progression with pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy. Recently, nivolumab showed a survival benefit over placebo in this setting. In the UK, since April 2020, nivolumab has been funded through the interim national COVID-19 cancer plan. We assessed the real-world efficacy and toxicity outcomes in MM patients treated with nivolumab at Guy’s Cancer Centre.Methods: We identified all chemotherapy-pre-treated patients administered single-agent nivolumab for MM. Baseline characteristics, treatment, response, survival and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Best responses – disease control or progression – were derived from radiologic and clinical documentation. Results: Twenty patients were identified. Median age was 72 years (range 45 – 85), 80% male and 95% had epithelioid (5% sarcomatoid) disease. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) measurements were unavailable. Nineteen (95%) had pleural and one peritoneal MM. ECOG PS was 0, 1 or 2 in 1 (5%), 16 (80%) and 3 (15%) patients respectively. All were previously exposed to pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy, and 4 (20%) had received rechallenge. Median time from prior treatment to commencement of nivolumab was 6 months. Median follow-up was 10.8 months. Median number of two-weekly 240mg equivalent cycles administered was twelve. Best response was disease control in 17 (85%) patients and progressive disease in 3 (15%). Median progression-free survival was 5.0 months (95% CI 3.7 – 6.2). Six patients (30%) had died by time of analysis, with median overall survival not reached. Twenty TRAEs were seen among 14 patients (70%), all except one graded 1/2 (Table 1). Conclusions: Nivolumab proved a safe and effective way to deliver non-myelosuppressive anticancer therapy at a favourable dosing schedule to a vulnerable population during the COVID-19 pandemic. These real-world outcomes corroborate findings from the CONFIRM trial, although limited by small sample size and retrospective nature.
ABSTRACT
Effects of waterpipe smoking on lung pathobiology and carcinogenesis remain sparse despite the worldwide emergence of this tobacco vector as a socially acceptable form of smoking, particularly among the youth. To address this gap, we investigated the effects of chronic waterpipe smoke (WPS) exposure on lung pathobiology, host immunity, and tumorigenesis using both an experimental animal model and an exploratory observational analysis of human waterpipe smokers and non-smokers. Mice exposed to increasing doses of WPS (once or five times per week for 20 weeks), through an exclusively devised exposure system for this study, were more prone to develop lung tumors compared to control-air exposed littermates. This effect was accompanied by various pro-tumor immune phenotypes, including increased IL-17A+ levels in T/B cells as well as elevated expression of the immune checkpoint PD-L1 and the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β in myeloid cells. While flow cytometry analysis revealed increased CD4 and CD8 T cell infiltration in WPSexposed mice, gene signatures of cytotoxic and expanded immune response were, conversely, decreased in animals exposed to heavy WPS relative to control air. Interestingly, mice heavily exposed to WPS exhibited increased expression of Tmprss4, Cd55, and Ace2, cell receptors and mediators of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) entry and, thus, COVID-19 pathogenesis. We also perform RNA-sequencing analysis of bronchial airway epithelial brushings of cancer-free waterpipe smokers and non-smokers undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy. Transcriptomes of normal airway cells in waterpipe smokers, relative to waterpipe non-smokers, harbored gene programs that were associated with poor clinical outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, alluding to a WPS-associated molecular injury, like that established in response to cigarette smoking. Overall, our analyses demonstrate immunomodulatory and carcinogenic effects of WPS on the murine and human lung. Our study also shows that WPS exposure leads to a field of injury that may be associated with increased risk for lung cancer. This study is unique for interrogating carcinogenic effects of chronic exposure to WPS with the longest, to our knowledge, follow-up time in vivo. Our findings accentuate the need for additional studies that can guide evidence-based policies to counteract shortfalls in public health control of waterpipe smoking.